The impact of the Internet on the macro-environment and on the industry structure

9 12 2008

This post is summarized from chapter 3 of the book “Strategies for E-business: Creating Value through Electronic and Mobile Commerce by Tawfik Jelassi and Albrecht Enders” combined with various sources from the internet.

The macro-environment takes a broad perspective of the factors that influence a firm’s strategy and performance. Evolving trends in the macro-environment can present significant opportunities and threats to a firm’s strategy. Therefore, at the outset of any strategy formulation, it is useful to analyze the trends that characterize the macro-environment in its different dimensions: political, legal, economic, social and technological.

The political and legal environment

The political and legal environment relates to issues on different organizational levels. At country and industry levels, it includes issues such as governmental subsidies, taxation, monopoly legislation and environmental laws.

The economic environment

The economic environment refers to broader economic developments within the context of a country, a regional dimension or a global dimension. Important factors in the economic environment are interest and exchange rates, evolution of stock markets and, more generally, economic growth rates. One example of how this dimension impacts the business was the rise and fall of dotcom industries. The favourable economic environment of the 1990s and the resulting cheap availability of capital contributed strongly to the quick rise of Internet companies. This rise found its abrupt halt in the burst of the bubble in March 2000 and the subsequent demise of most of these Internet start-ups.

The social environment

The social environment considers factors such as population demographics, income distribution between different sectors of society, social mobility of people, and differing attitudes to work and leisure. Social developments were the main driver behind the development of numerous e-business applications. For instance, if, due to their careers, members of a developed society increasingly become cash-rich but time-poor, then businesses that address this problem for the individual consumer can create substantial benefit. The online retailer Tesco.com, for example, primarily targets customers who do not have the time or the desire to systematically shop in a physical grocery store.

The technological environment

The technological environment is of significant importance in the context of e-business. Technological innovations (such as the Internet or wireless devices) led to the emergence of new market opportunities and business models.  After most of the technological standards have become more common-place in wireline e-business applications, much attention has been paid to the evolution of new technology standards for wireless devices..

Five-forces framework

Porter proposes a five-forces framework, which outlines the main factors determining a firm’s ability to capture the value it creates. In essence, this ability is determined largely by the attractiveness of the industry in which a firm competes. The five structural features that determine industry attractiveness are: (1) industry rivalry, (2) barriers to entry, (3) substitute products, (4) bargaining power of suppliers and (5) bargaining power of buyers.

Industry rivalry

Industry rivalry occurs when firms within an industry feel the pressure or the opportunity to enhance their existing market position. High intensity of rivalry within an industry results from the following structural factors:

  • Large number of competitors.
  • High fixed costs..
  • High strategic relevance.
  • Little differentiation between products.
  • Low growth rate of the industry.
  • Excess capacity.

Barriers to entry

Barriers to entry determine the threat of new competitors to enter the market of a specific industry. New entrants, bringing new capacity and the desire to gain market share, have two negative effects on the attractiveness of an industry. First, new entrants take away market share from existing incumbents. Second, they bid down prices, which in turn reduces the profitability of the incumbent companies. Consequently, profitability of any given industry tends to decrease as barriers to entry are lowered, and vice versa. In general, high barriers to entry result mainly from the following factors:

  • High fixed costs
  • Trust and brand loyalty
  • A steep learning curve
  • High switching costs and strong network effects
  • Strong intellectual property protection

Substitute products

The intensity of pressure from substitute products depends on the availability of similar products that serve essentially the same or a similar purpose as the products from within the industry. As the availability and quality of substitute products increase, so profits generated within the industry tend to decrease. This is due to the fact that substitutes place a ceiling on prices that firms within the industry can charge for their products. The Internet has helped to increase the pressure from substitute products, as it tends to increase the variety of products available to customers.

Bargaining powers of buyers and suppliers

The bargaining power of buyers tends to be high (and that of suppliers low) if the industry displays the following characteristics:

  • High concentration of buyers
  • Strong fragmentation of suppliers
  • A high degree of market transparency
  • Products are increasingly becoming commodities
  • Low switching costs and weak network effect

The perspective offered by the five forces framework might seem to be too static in a rapidly changing business world, where industries are in constant flux. It is, indeed, increasingly difficult to define industry boundaries, which are becoming more and more blurred due to, among others, mergers and acquisitions. However, this does not mean that the five forces framework has become irrelevant, since it still helps to pinpoint competitive and industry conditions that are subject to change. With the rising importance of the Internet, it has become more important to think about its business impact.





Markets for e-business

9 12 2008

This post is summarized from chapter 4 of the book “Strategies for E-business: Creating Value through Electronic and Mobile Commerce by Tawfik Jelassi and Albrecht Enders” combined with various sources from the internet.

Electronic Marketplaces and Portal

These marketplaces serves as information hubs for major industries, or in other words, vertical portals

Natures of vertical portal:

  • Industry marketplace
  • Independent exchange
  • Public marketplace

Industry marketplace

An example is www.SciQuest.com, an industry market in life science chemicals. This model was not very successful and most of independent industry marketplace do not earn profit

Private Stores and Customers Portals

Established companies can keep control of transaction on their own hands.
Customer portal, for example Cisco and Dell.

Entrance to these exchanges is password protected. Customers can negotiate price reduction on a limited selection of products.

Private Company Marketplaces

This model supported by e-Procurement software is suitable for large company in order to:

  • Manage MRO procurement process
  • Other supporting functionalities
  • Bid on business
  • Integrate e-procurement software into private company marketplace

Industry Consortia-Sponsored Marketplaces

This kind of marketplace can be used by companies without enough power to force suppliers to deal with them through a private company marketplace.

Examples of these marketplaces are:

  • Covisint — GM, Ford, and DaimlerChrysler
  • Avendra — Marriott, Hyatt
  • Transora — Sara Lee, Coca Cola, P&G




Value creation in e-business

9 12 2008

This post is summarized from chapter 5 of the book “Strategies for E-business: Creating Value through Electronic and Mobile Commerce by Tawfik Jelassi and Albrecht Enders” combined with various sources from the internet.

Creating Value

  • Businesses create value for their customers by providing quality goods and services at acceptable prices.
  • A business model that provides more benefits to its customers and/or sells at a lower the price will take market share away from competitors.
  • A commerce or business model is the basic process by which a business obtains its inventory, produces the good or service, and how they deliver that to the customer.

Six E-Business Value Creation Processes

  • An online purchasing perspective: allows for buying and selling of products and information on the Internet and other online services.
  • A digital communication perspective: allows for delivery of digital information, products, services, or payments online.
  • A service perspective: allows for the cutting of costs, improving of the quality of goods, and increasing the speed of service.
  • A business process perspective: allows automation of business transactions and work flows.
  • A market-of-one perspective: allows for developing products for a single customer with close to the same costs as mass production.
  • An auction based perspective: allows automation of bidding for products or customers online.

Digital Communication Strategy

Digital products are information-based products, such as multimedia entertainment, programs, online information services, published information, music, video, or any other digital content can be transferred over the Internet. Pay content sites are generally targeted toward individuals who have a high need for information and some sites follow radio and broadcast television models and obtain revenue through advertising. They also play a role in supporting and enhancing the associated traditional media.

Service Strategy

The service strategy impacts two areas:
1. Supporting businesses that specialize in providing services to the customer. These includes educational institutions, physicians, banks, realtors, insurance agents, and many others.
2. Enhancing the service component of a businesses by meeting customer service needs before, during, and after the sale. Answering questions about a product, how it is used, or how it fits a specific purpose, and handling any problems that may occur after the sale.

Creating value for customers

Creating value is the obvious way of gaining and keeping competitive advantage is to create better value for customers. The goal is to establish a long-term customer relationship. The internet and development of e-commerce offers great opportunities for creating value for customers

EDI on the Internet

Open architecture for the Internet :

- Internet EDI or Web EDI
- Replacement for the expensive leased lines and slow dial-up connections
- Not fully repalced, already significant investments
- XML specification for e-business: ebXML

Many companies are reluctant to use Internet to transmit Financial EDI transaction sets that contain transfer instructions for large amounts of money, and indicates that the shift from EDI will gradually occur.

SCM using Internet Technology

Achieve a higher-quality or lower-cost product at the end of the chain, achieve faster, cheaper, and better service. Costs can be reduced by sharing information with suppliers.

Internet and web can be very effective communications enhancers. Suppliers can share information about customer demand fluctuations, receive rapid notification of product design changes and adjustments, provide specifications and drawings more efficiently, increase the speed of processing transactions, reduce transaction costs and errors.

Using Materials-Tracking Technologies with EDI and E-Commerce

Tracking materials can be used to manage inventory flows and forecast materials needs across their supply chain, one of the methods is by using RFID (Radio Frequency Identification Devices)





Amazon.com vs BOL.de

3 12 2008

BOL failed to gain brand recognition around Europe. Only in Germany is the site site relatively successful. It is the number two e-commerce site after Amazon.de – but it lags far behind. In May, 16.9 percent of Web users visited Amazon.de, but only 5.8 percent visited BOL.de.

Overall, Amazon has a much stronger position in Europe than BOL. During the first quarter of 2001, Amazon reported sales of $132 million at its four non-U.S. sites: U.K., France, Germany and Japan. BOL, which had operations in 11 European and five Asian countries, said it expected sales of $79 million (DM180 million) for its fiscal year ending June 30.

Questions:

1. Is it justifiable for a company like Amazon.com to continue investing so much money and effort in a business operation that not only has never made a profit but is incurring heavier losses?

2. Will Bertelsmann benefit (or be hindered) by its physical organizational structure and management processes in its attempt to strengthen its position as an electronic commerce product/service provider? Defend your arguments.

3. In your opinion, what industries/companies would constitute a threat to Amazon.com and/or Bertelsmann’s BOL over the next three to five years? Explain.

4. What success factors do you think are critical for online books (and mass-media) sales and, more generally, for launching an electronic commerce business?





CitiusNet: the emergence of a global electronic market

3 12 2008

Background
CitiusNet is a company that provides a third-party electronic trading system for products that are used in the production and administrative process such as office goods. Providing originally an EDI support system for linking just to one supplier-CitiusNet (by that time CitiusNet operated under the name Brun Passot). In order to fight this drawback the company started to develop a multi-supplier telepurchasing system and launched CITIUS in 1993, the “first European platform for B2B electronic commerce” and evolved to an early Internet marketplace. CitiusNet as the electronic intermediate connected purchasers and suppliers through EDI using a telecommunications network or optionally a VAN. It offered supplier catalogs, catalog management, order management, EDI translation services and payment transactions.

Third Party Marketplace
This emerging model is suitable in case companies wish to leave the Web marketing to a third party (possibly as an add-on to their other channels). They all have in common that they offer at least a user interlace to the suppliers’ product catalogues. Several additional features like branding, payment, logistics, ordering, and ultimately the full scale of secure transactions are added to 3rd parly marketplaces. Revenues can be generated on the basis of one-off membership fee, service fees, transaction fee, or percentage on transaction value. CitiusNet grasps the opportunity by providing necessary services for this model.

The vertical Internet portals or hubs serve as a point of access for companies operating in a specific business field to support business transactions. A vertical portal can also be the platform for different business communities and can support all transaction phases. Particularly used for procurement to lower transaction costs vertical hubs provide product catalogs and supplier listings. Furthermore they might as well offer online brokerage services to find business partners that match best specific supplier or purchaser profiles.

Competitive Advantage
CitiusNet not only moved business from VANs to an Internet marketplace but also built competitive advantage. Three crucial competitive advantages established CitiusNet’s assets. The first is community building. This represents the idea that once a large purchaser is using CitiusNet’s marketplace, its suppliers are pulled to the market as well since they themselves will benefit from putting their catalogs online and thereby generate more business. Secondly, content is important. A rich set of product catalogs will clearly attract more customers. And thirdly control is necessary to identify business processes and requirements in order to be able to add value to the customers’ business process.





Mondus.com

3 12 2008

Mondus has developed a global, online business-to-business marketplace for small and medium-sized businesses. It is one of the first initiatives in the emerging B2B e-marketplaces sector to focus solely on SMEs.

The exploitation of Internet technologies to streamline the ‘request for proposal’ process sits right at the heart of Mondus. As a result, there are greater efficiencies for both buyer and supplier. Suppliers are able to achieve deeper penetration in the SME market, one that has traditionally been costly to impact successfully. Buyers too, without the clout of the big multinational organisations, are able to realise low-cost, high-quality services, and eliminate the inconvenience of identifying vendors and exploring bids.

Mondus’ business model is particularly sophisticated, as demonstrated by its decision to source a partner to design the Web site. This is a complex service requirement that ordinarily demands an understanding of technical and process requirements. The Mondus facility allows SMEs to outline information on both the supplier and the buyer accounts so that the marketplace can make a reasonable judgment as to which company would be best suited to their needs.

It is a measure of the success of the site, which has received $16.7m in investment, that 150,000 people have become registered users since October1999, and have made £32m of purchases in the marketplace. Nearly 700,000 unique users per month at the last count suggests there are substantial growth prospects for the future.

Mondus is the first European online business-to-business marketplace designed exclusively to meet the procurement purchasing needs of small and medium-sized businesses who don’t have extra time to do all the legalwork involved in researching and comparing products, or extra money to waste in making the wrong purchase decisions.

By August 1999, mondus com was valuated at US$60 million. In September 1999, the UK website mondus.co.uk was officially launched. One month later, the US website mondus.com became operational and another venture capitalist, Zouk Ventures, invested US$ 3 million. Since the local telecommunication company could not set up the Internet connection any earlier, the German website mondus.de started in November 1999. Two months later, an office was opened in Paris and mondus’ fourth nationl website, mondus.fr, became available just one year after the initial business plan had been submitted. The company’s original name was mondus.com ltd. On 19 May 2000, it was changed to mondus ltd. Its headquarters were located in Oxford, England.

Timing of case

The name mondus.com had already been registered in 1997. By August 1999, mondus com was valuated at US$60 million, after Eden Capital, a venture capitalist firm, committed US$12 million for the company’s expansion into the US and Germany. The company’s original name was mondus.com ltd. On 19 May 2000, it was changed to mondus ltd. Its headquarters were located in Oxford, England.

Objectives

Mondus was a horizontal web-based B2B marketplace that refers to an application that was offered to a wide range of industries. It aimed at offering a one-stop procurement solution to small and medium sized enterprises by matching buyers and sellers through its website.

The strategy was to register through various marketing tools as many users as possible in order to make the product known to the market.

There were three objectives in creating partnerships: to attract traffic to the mondus site, to complement their services and to support it with technical services. Mondus tried to cooperate with Internet companies that had strong brands in their markets.

From the very beginning mondus focused on its international expansion

Resources (apart from ICT)

Mondus only charged sellers a fee on successful transactions settled through mondus. All services provided to the buyer were free. Initially, sellers were also charged for submitting quotes, but mondus changed its policy to motivate vendors to quote and to increase the number of quotes submitted per RFP.
The transactions fee charged was 2% of the transaction volume. Though originally mondus planned to apply different percentages depending on the product category, it finally preferred to charge a flat fee.

Activities

The mondus’ business model was that B2B markets were mainly buyer driven.
- Multi-catalogue models
- In reverse auctions
- Seller-centric models
- The RFP model (request-for-proposal) was the most flexible solution since it allowed vendors to compete on price and any value added feature.
The matching of buyers and suppliers was a three-step procedure.
Firstly, the buyer placed a request. Secondly, one or more supplier replied to the request by submitting a quote. Thirdly, the buyer viewed all the quotes, if necessary negotiated with the sellers, and accepted or rejected the received quotes.

The above process was facilitated thorough the modus homepage, which was divided into a buy and sell section
In the buy homepage, buyers requested the product or service they needed. In the sell homepage, sellers could view the requests currently submitted and place quotes. All users of the system had a personal noticeboard (my mondus) that informed buyers through the buy noticeboard about their quotes.

Outputs and results

The number of worldwide customers had increased significantly since mondus launched its first Web site in October 1999. As of 8 May 2000, there were 86.892 customers registered World Wide, 76% of whom were buyers. The average number of orders per active buyer was 1.9 (this percentage should be taken qualitatively only since some sellers had also placed RFPs). Active sellers had placed, on average, 9.7 bids.
The average volume of quotes was about US$3000 worldwide; there was data variation from week to week due to the different transaction volumes in the various product and service categories.
Buyer benefits:
- Streamlining the procurement process
- Convenient and easy procedure
- Low investment and costs
- Customisation
- Confidentiality and safety

Seller benefits:
- Access to online trading and new market opportunities
- Using the mondus brand
- Gaining a competitive advantage

Lessons and conclusions

There was a lot of interest in the mondus concept but some quotes were not price competitive and sometimes customers did not get enough quotes.
Most vendors complained that they never got feedback on their quotes. Other suppliers stated that they did not have the time to go through all the RFPs and send quotes for each of them.
It was important to mondus to ensure that sufficient quotes were submitted on RFPs. The idea was to have a lot of power suppliers, which are suppliers that agree to quote on a competitive level and with which mondus develops relationships. It believes that there would be more quotes as the number of sellers grew and customers used the system more frequently.

A major problem was that buyers and sellers only used mondus to get in contact with each other.